This morning, my debut piece on the Internet Baseball Writer’s Association of America “Here’s the Pitch” Daily Newsletter published. The piece can be found here and it’s open to anyone to view and read. In this piece, I talked about the dichotomy between the more “business-focused” MLB organizations that have emerged in the “post-Moneyball” era, and how the Royals seem be more “baseball-focused” under general manager Dayton Moore, who will begin his 15th year as general manager in Kansas City. While I certainly laud Moore and the Royals ownership’s focus on “baseball” over “business”, especially in regard to personnel decisions, I do mention how it has not necessarily produced the most successful product in the field, as Moore has only had three winning seasons in his tenure as GM.
Here is an excerpt from the piece:
“Business sense” over “baseball experience” seems to be the “gold standard” among MLB front offices today. However, the Kansas City Royals and general manager Dayton Moore, the second-longest tenured GM in baseball (only Brian Cashman has been with the Yankees longer), seem to buck that trend.
In Kansas City, it is all about baseball, even when popular trends hint that the Royals should perhaps be more “Moneyball” savvy. According to Forbes Magazine’s most recent MLB franchise valuations, the Royals rank 29th out of 30 when it comes to team value. When it comes to TV market size, only Milwaukee and Cincinnati are smaller than Kansas City.
No one would fault the Royals for being more “business”-centered. To some critics, they probably should focus on the bottom line more often when it comes to making personnel decisions. And yet, that is not Moore’s modus operandi…
“Baseball vs. Business People: Dayton Moore and the Royals Way” by Kevin O’Brien; Here Comes the Pitch Newsletter, December 11th, 2020
Once again, check out the full article and subscribe to the newsletter. While a basic subscription (i.e. free) will get you regular access, a paid subscription will get you full, daily access to the newsletter, which is chock full of great writing. Honestly, this newsletter has been one of my favorites to follow over the past few months, as it has been great to see what kind of great independent baseball writers are out there on the Internet.
In the wake of Baseball Hall of Fame and MLB Award voting season, it seems like every year we are reminded by how the BBWAA (Baseball Writers Association of America) can be unnecessary gate keepers at times, often populated by some crotchety and disconnected members who should give way to more passionate and knowledgeable baseball writers. I don’t want to bash the BBWAA too much, as I know 95 percent of the writers who make up the organizations are class acts and talented at what they do, and Kansas City is lucky to have such talented baseball beat writers in Jeffrey Flanagan (MLB.com), Alec Lewis (The Athletic), and Lynn Worthy (The Kansas City Star). However, that 5 percent seems to stick out more than usual around this time (usually with stupid grandstanding), which ends up putting a blemish not only on the organization and other baseball writers, but on the game itself, which has lost steam to the NFL and NBA over the past couple of decades.
Thankfully, over the past year, I have discovered the IBWAA, which has been rejuvenated by co-directors Daniel Epstein and Jonathan Becker (they have helped forge a partnership with SABR which has also been awesome as well). In addition to being a member, which has helped me grow my voice and network as an online baseball blogger, I have also been lucky to follow some amazing independent baseball writers. Truly, there are some amazing baseball analysts that are a part of this organization, and the HTP newsletter showcases all those different voices each day. If you truly love baseball, and truly value independent voice and journalists (things that are going to shit, if this past year has taught us anything), then please subscribe and support this important and thorough online publication.
Not only will the newsletter help you be a better baseball fan, but it will help support a growing number of online writers, bloggers, podcasters, researchers, and just fans in general who are helping evolve the understanding of the great game of baseball.
[…] “assets”, Moore truly looks out for players, both at the Major and Minor League level, as I have written on this blog before. Furthermore, if anything, Moore and the Royals have probably “overpaid” for players in […]
LikeLike
[…] Moore and the Royals front office is known for “zigging” when others “zag”, and that has often been the case in the MLB Draft under Moore’s tenure. After going pretty […]
LikeLike
[…] Honestly, I do not think Whit is referring to the Royals ownership here, or at least the current regime (David Glass was known for being pretty cheap in his early years, pre-Dayton Moore). I also believe that Moore is closer to that “baseball-type” rather than that “business type” of executive that Whit refers to, as I wrote about before on the IBWAA “Here’s the Pitch” Newsletter. […]
LikeLike
[…] values his people and truly loves the game. I wrote in an IBWAA “Here’s the Pitch” newsletter that Moore was the “anti-Moneyball” executive in that he values “baseball” […]
LikeLike
[…] is no question that what Moore and the Royals did for Minor League players during the pandemic was the right thing …. In an era where organizations treat players as “commodities” and little else (looking […]
LikeLike
[…] in the KC Metro area. And during the pandemic, when most clubs were cutting costs to save money, Moore pushed Sherman to pay Minor League players and lower-level employees, even if it came at a pay cut to his own […]
LikeLike
[…] I have written before, Moore was the “anti-Moneyball” GM, which was refreshing at times, especially with every baseball club trying to copy Oakland or […]
LikeLike